(no subject)
This is about the situation in Smichov. This is about the fact that people are dying in a city across the sea, and the fact that we are not there, trying to save them.
There is nothing harder than seeing the news coverage of a broken body being pulled from a pile of rubble and thinking to yourself 'I could have stopped that'. There is nothing more difficult than knowing that before the day is through, there will be many more bodies and many more piles of rubble and still you will have done nothing to help them there. But there is a limit to what we can do, and there is a reason for holding back. And though you may be hard-pressed to find that reason or understand it when you do, know that it exists. We are only human. We may have extraordinary abilities and the extraordinary responsibilities that come with them, but when it is all said and done, we are human. And we are governed by human laws and human rules, and the minute we pretend that we are not, we become something dangerous and foolhardy. If we ignored the mandates of our government, of the Czech government, and go to Smichov, there is absolutely nothing guaranteeing that we would be able to get close enough to help, let alone stop what is happening. Sacrificing ourselves may be the 'right' thing to do, but that does not mean we should do it.
It is an outrage, what is happening in Smichov right now. It is a base, deplorable, horrifying event. I cannot help but feel sick when I watch the coverage, and it is difficult to imagine a world in which this is happening, right now. But just as someone with means choosing to live on the street will not help a homeless person feel warmer at night, giving the Czech government a real mutant threat will not make their actions cease. And so we are left to rant and rail against each other instead of focusing on the things we can do. Terry is going to the Red Cross. I charge anyone who is outraged at our lack of action to consider their own actions, and then hers. There are things we can do, and we should be doing them. Sometimes the day cannot be saved by heroes in black leather. Sometimes the lesson is far, far harder to learn.
People are dying across the sea, and we cannot be there to save them. Let us instead make sure their deaths are not in vain. Let us work together and do what we can. We cannot give more or less than our all.
There is nothing harder than seeing the news coverage of a broken body being pulled from a pile of rubble and thinking to yourself 'I could have stopped that'. There is nothing more difficult than knowing that before the day is through, there will be many more bodies and many more piles of rubble and still you will have done nothing to help them there. But there is a limit to what we can do, and there is a reason for holding back. And though you may be hard-pressed to find that reason or understand it when you do, know that it exists. We are only human. We may have extraordinary abilities and the extraordinary responsibilities that come with them, but when it is all said and done, we are human. And we are governed by human laws and human rules, and the minute we pretend that we are not, we become something dangerous and foolhardy. If we ignored the mandates of our government, of the Czech government, and go to Smichov, there is absolutely nothing guaranteeing that we would be able to get close enough to help, let alone stop what is happening. Sacrificing ourselves may be the 'right' thing to do, but that does not mean we should do it.
It is an outrage, what is happening in Smichov right now. It is a base, deplorable, horrifying event. I cannot help but feel sick when I watch the coverage, and it is difficult to imagine a world in which this is happening, right now. But just as someone with means choosing to live on the street will not help a homeless person feel warmer at night, giving the Czech government a real mutant threat will not make their actions cease. And so we are left to rant and rail against each other instead of focusing on the things we can do. Terry is going to the Red Cross. I charge anyone who is outraged at our lack of action to consider their own actions, and then hers. There are things we can do, and we should be doing them. Sometimes the day cannot be saved by heroes in black leather. Sometimes the lesson is far, far harder to learn.
People are dying across the sea, and we cannot be there to save them. Let us instead make sure their deaths are not in vain. Let us work together and do what we can. We cannot give more or less than our all.
no subject
no subject
I don't contest that there are some circumstances in which it is unsuitable to resort to public action, but I find your comparison entirely invalid.
The issue isn't at all that the person with means should be making grand and foolish gestures to live on the street. The point is that people with means should be finding a way to use theirs to help the ones who are.
The school is one of the preeminent centres for mutant-rights, and we have in this place people who can bend matter with their naked minds -- and you're telling me the grand limit of what the school could envision here was to don the leather and play the superhero?
no subject
no subject
Because extensive contacts for future purusal mean so much to those who died for want of medical supplies last week. Right.
I'm sure that will come as a great comfort for those in the ghettos, to know what we would have done if only it had been feasible at the time.
No powers is the least of the problems I have here. This lot have money. With enough money, anything can get done. The professor is quite wealthy. As are Mr. Dayspring, as is Dr. MacTaggart. You have plenty of resources at hand. What were you doing with it?
no subject
I'd suggest speaking to the Professor, or Nathan when he returns.
no subject
But very well. Your ignorance is noted. I shall await the return of one who actually knows that of which he speaks.
no subject
Would there have been this much hesitation if I had been taken to Prague, instead of San Diego? For fear of an international incident?
no subject
What is the issue is that anyone wanting to get into Smichov would have had to fight their way in and continue fighting, instead of helping people.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
It does not matter if I say it here or in private, my point is still the same.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
If anyone needs a ride, I'll be going first thing in the morning.
no subject
Just because I didn't respond to Terry's thing doesn't mean I didn't do anything.
no subject
no subject
As much as I feel like we're fighting the good fight on the homefront, there's no garauntee this'll get there in time to really help many people.
It's like being stuck in a hotel all over again.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I understand - grudgingly - that we cannot just thumb our nose at a sovereign country and breach international borders in the name of humanitarian relief. If folks head there directly - they can't do it covertly. If they do it covertly, it'll take so much time the Red Cross will already be there with any aid we could provide, and in larger and more professional quantities.
We could do the right thing and say screw the Czech politicians who caused this problem, go in there, get people out of the war zone, and be gone. That would do good in the immediate term, but the repercussions would prevent any further good.
This sucks. Where is it written that we have to stand by and watch people die on TV, just so the possibility for future good is not taken away? I know there's no real option, no matter how much money gets thrown at it or how much we want to change things from here.
World needs to change.
no subject
As you said, I heartily agree, this sucks.
no subject
It's far worse without the distance the television provides.
no subject
Not to mention, Red Cross? Bunch of idiots playing nurse.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)